Paviane in the Nuremberg zoo: killing ensures massive criticism!
Paviane in the Nuremberg zoo: killing ensures massive criticism!
Tiergarten Nürnberg, 90402 Nürnberg, Deutschland - In the Nuremberg zoo, the fate of the Guinea paviane living there is on the brink. For over a year, the zoo management has been discussing possible measures, considering a crowded monkey house. The current existence of 43 couples has reached the capacity limits of the expanded system in 2009, which leads to conflicts and injuries within the group. In this context, plans for the killing of individual animals were known in February 2024, which aim at regulating genetic diversity in the stock. The zoo has had to take a lot of criticism in the past; Employees reported threats from animal welfare activists.
The zoo has checked several offers to record the animals in recent months. Offers from Austria, Slovenia, India and Great Britain have failed. While Austria and India did not provide any information on the keeping conditions, the accommodation in the Slovenian Zoo was classified as unsuitable for Guinea-Paviane. The reports on an proposed offer from the Great Ape Project in Great Britain are not correct, according to the Tiergarten administration; Basic information is also missing here. Since February 2024, the zoo has repeatedly asked to clarify without receiving an answer.
alternatives to killing
Some voices within the professional world suggest that the castration of all pavia is considering to prevent the overpopulation. This measure could also apply to other primate species and would be a humane alternative to killing. The apparent conflict of goals between animal welfare and management aims to keep the population of the Guinea Paviane under control, which is considered to be endangered and is to be kept internationally to maintain species in zoos.
The discussion about the killing of the Paviane has also attracted nationwide attention. Critics, including animal welfare organizations, vehemently argue that such measures are irresponsible and are seen as a "bankruptcy declaration" of animal husbandry. The animal welfare association emphasizes that killing animals in zoos is increasingly criticizing. This practice is often classified as an economically motivated decision and not as a really sustainable species protection measure.
legal framework conditions
important legal considerations also play a role in the ongoing debate. A comment on the Animal Welfare Act says that killing and feeding zoo animals is legally problematic. In view of such legal hurdles, some zoos, such as the Augsburg Zoo, have set up an ethics committee that decides on such measures. The focus here is on the well -being of the animals, and attempts are made to avoid fatal interventions, if possible.
The conditions in the Nuremberg Tiergarten illustrate the dilemma, in which many zoos are now. It is important to regulate the population of the animals in a balancing act that takes into account both species protection and the well -being of the animals in a healthy way. The gap between the goals of species protection and the conditions in Zoo is a challenge that urgently needs to be addressed.
animal welfare organizations therefore call for a rethink in dealing with animals in zoos, away from the killing of "surplus" animals to an approach that focuses on the species -appropriate living conditions and the well -being of all zoo animals. They advocate that zoos fundamentally deal with the concept of killing and find other ways to minimize animal suffering and to seriously pursue the protection of endangered species.
BR added that a strong social reaction against these measures can be expected. The Tierschutzbund also calls up to find the killing of excessive animals.
Details | |
---|---|
Ort | Tiergarten Nürnberg, 90402 Nürnberg, Deutschland |
Quellen |
Kommentare (0)