More transparency in Hanau: Judges by AI easier to see!

More transparency in Hanau: Judges by AI easier to see!

In a pioneering pilot project to improve consumer information about court judgments in Hanau, a new pseudonymization tool called "Jano" is tested. This tool is intended to help increase the transparency and accessibility of judgments for the public. The project, which is being developed at the Hanau district court and the district court in Mannheim, has the goal of being extended to all ordinary dishes in Hesse and Baden-Württemberg by autumn 2023, such as lvz reported.

So far, the anonymization of judgment texts has been manually, which is both susceptible to errors and is complex. The "Jano" tool is now to automate this process. It is tested at courts in Frankfurt, Wiesbaden and Darmstadt, and the roles of the process participants are retained in order to guarantee the readability of the judgment texts. Data protection is a central topic of the project, and the application is web -based and accessible to all dishes.

goal of the initiative

A main concern of this initiative is to increase the publication rate of judgments in Germany. Currently, only 1-2% of all judgments are published, which significantly complicates the procurement of information for citizens. The participants hope that "Jano" not only increases the accessibility of judgments, but also contributes to the transparency of court work. The use of "Jano" also creates valuable training data for future AI applications.

The legal framework for the anonymization or pseudonymization of data, especially in the context of artificial intelligence, is clearly regulated by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This stipulates that personal data must be protected by suitable measures such as pseudonymization in order to meet legal requirements. According to lawyers' ki means pseudonymization that identifying features are replaced by pseudonyms, while the data is still considered to be personal. Such measures are not only legally required, they can also offer competitive advantages.

GDPR and their relevance

The implementation of the pseudonymization in the context of "Jano" could be supported by various legal regulations of the GDPR, such as Art. 4 No. 1 and Art. 32. These articles emphasize the importance of pseudonymization as a security measure to protect the privacy of the data subjects. The legal necessity of these steps is underlined by current judgments from the past, such as the decisions of the ECJ and the BGH, which confirm the relevance of pseudonymization in various contexts.

In addition, there is intensively discussing how challenges in data protection affect consumers. Dr. Data protection reports of cases in which data protection liability plays a role, such as when notifying illness cases by employers and the long-term storage of negative entries due to information that can be a hindrance when looking for an apartment. Consumer rights and compliance with the GDPR are therefore the focus of current legal disputes.

The developments around the "Jano" tool could not only increase the transparency of the case law, but also represent an important step towards a responsible handling of data in the judicial system. The combination of technological innovations and legal framework shows how important the approach of improved freedom of information and data protection is.