Sleeping by Wolfhund Nanouk: Animal rights activists defend themselves massively!

Sleeping by Wolfhund Nanouk: Animal rights activists defend themselves massively!

An unusual and emotionally charged case around the Wolfhund Nanouk recently caused excitement in the region. Animal rights activists and animal lovers mobile the district's decision to put the dog to sleep. As mdr is reported above all as a symbol for the unclear legal situation of wolf hundles and their attitude.

The district argued that there was no suitable owner for Nanouk. However, the dog's previous supervisor was ready to take over it temporarily, and a suitable owner has already been found. This application of events has called on the critics, which the measures of the authorities perceive as unfair and exaggerated. The online petition against the sleeping asleep received almost 11,000 signatures, which makes the great interest and resistance in the population clear.

legal gray zones

A central point in the discussion is the legal framework for Wolf Hund-Hybriden. According to Federal Ministry of the Federal Ministry have such animals the same protection status as wolves as long as they occur in the first four generations after an intersection. This means that they cannot simply be treated and killed like overgrown dogs. Nevertheless, wolfhybrids live in a legal gray area, since mixed belts are not permitted as pets and it remains unclear how to proceed in the specific case.

experts indicate that hybrids are particularly demanding in the attitude and are not well adapted to life in nature. This is also evident in their tendency to cause conflicts with people or farm animals. However, the assessment of how to deal with these mixed lines varies greatly, as an article from Agrarheute . It is not unusual that such animals have to be removed in their natural environment - be it alive or dead.

criticism of the authorities

animal rights activists like Kay Wagner were outraged by the design of the decision to approve the sleeping of Nanouk. He described this way of act as "pure arbitrariness and demonstration of power". An incident in which a volunteer was bitten also causes additional uncertainties, since it himself granted mistakes in dealing with Nanouk.

The case not only causes discussions in the region, but is also intensively debated on social media. Users criticize the decision of the veterinary office and show solidarity with the animal rights activists. While the affinity for the breeding of wolf dogs and the responsibility of the owners are subjectively considered, the legal assessment of these hybrids remains a controversial topic in Germany.

How this case will develop remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: the discussion about wolf dogs and their legal situation has long since started and will not end in the future.