MDR does not include an image: Taleb A. in the focus of media ethics

MDR does not include an image: Taleb A. in the focus of media ethics

In a highly sensitive procedure that is once again heating up the public discussion about media ethics, it was decided not to show Taleb A.'s face during the ongoing trial on the Christmas market attack. The MDR reports that this decision is not only legally defensible, but also based on profound moral considerations. At a time when media reporting of violent acts in society is repeatedly viewed critically, the question remains as to how far journalists should go in portraying perpetrators.

The pixelation of Taleb A.'s face is particularly relevant given his past efforts to attract public attention. The MDR does not want to offer him a platform for self-expression and decides not to focus unnecessarily on the perpetrator. This decision not only protects the victims and survivors, whose emotions could potentially be further disturbed by an unpixelated image, but also prevents potential copycat acts.

The phenomenon of the copycat effect

Another aspect that comes to light in the current discussion about media reporting on violent crimes is the so-called copycat effect. According to scientific literature analyzed as part of a comprehensive study of the phenomenon, school shootings are rare but receive immense media attention because of their cruelty. This type of reporting is often seen as a triggering factor for copycat crimes. The copycat effect is a media effect that can influence the form, timing and likelihood of similar acts.

Although research largely denies the direct causative effect of violent acts reported in the media, the copycat effect is viewed as a serious possibility. The study shows that real reported actions have a higher probability of being imitated than fictional content. Journalists must therefore be extremely sensitive when reporting such events and consider the possible long-term and short-term effects of their reports.

The responsibility of the media

As the MDR explains in its report, the reporting on Taleb A. is deliberately kept cautious. Not every statement is reproduced unchanged in order to counteract possible sensationalization. The work, which looks at the current state of research on the copycat effect in school shootings, recommends how press agencies should act responsibly in sensitive reporting on acts of violence.

Given the responsibility that media bears, it is important to consider how the portrayal of perpetrators affects not only the public but also the communities affected. A good knack for dealing with such topics is necessary in order to protect victims and promote responsible discussion. We can only hope that the process continues within a framework that not only serves the truth, but also takes into account the protection and respect for the victims.

Further information on the topic can be found in the comprehensive analyzes by MDR and studies on media reports of violent crime DB Thuringia.