Investigations against girls in Meißen: case of alleged kidnapping set

Investigations against four girls in Meißen due to suspected kidnapping; Prosecutor sees no evidence.
Investigations against four girls in Meißen due to suspected kidnapping; Prosecutor sees no evidence. (Symbolbild/NAG)

Investigations against girls in Meißen: case of alleged kidnapping set

In Meißen, a case has developed that excited the minds and has now taken new turns. Some time ago, a 13-year-old Slovak student was accused, kidnapped and abused by four girls. But now it turns out that the investigation against these girls has been set. As Sächsische.de Dresden to the conclusion that the alleged course of the crime cannot be objectively confirmed.

Originally, the advertiser made serious allegations by stating that the girls approached in the Käthe-Kollwitz-Park, brought to an empty building, tied up there and beaten with a stick. This devastating scenario led to a considerable public sensation. During the investigation, however, it turned out that there was a lack of clear evidence such as injuries or other traces. After detailed investigations, the public prosecutor's office was able to determine that the alleged act could not have taken place.

Missing evidence and wrong suspicion

The consequences of the advertisement are not insignificant: A procedure for false suspicion has been initiated against the Slovakian advertiser, but this was discontinued. Since she is under 14 years old, she is considered to be incapable of guilt. Interestingly, your motif remains in the dark, no specific reasons for your statements were known.

It is essential that no investigation was initiated against the point of view who worked in communication between the deaf girl and the investigative authorities. This fact raises questions and could mean that the entire situation would have to be examined in more detail.

deprivation of freedom in the context

But how does German criminal law define deprivation of freedom and what does that mean for similar cases? According to Lawyer Erhard Freedom deprivation is a serious interference with the fundamental right to personal freedom and is regulated in § 239 StGB. One of the characteristics is to lock someone or in other ways to restrict his freedom of movement against the will of the person concerned. Even short -term restrictions can be considered to be deprived of freedom.

In the context of this case, it is interesting to see that even a consent gained by deception cannot lead to the setting of the fact, which the DetailsOrtMeißen, DeutschlandQuellen