Robbery drama in Eilenburg: teenager in court for cell phone attack!
Tobias Krest and Sandy Zirla are on trial in the case of robbery and assault in Eilenburg. The case was temporarily discontinued after being accused of assaulting a 15-year-old with a cell phone while he was in custody.

Robbery drama in Eilenburg: teenager in court for cell phone attack!
What's going on in Eilenburg? An incident that happened almost two years ago is now causing a stir in the city's district court. Tobias Krest (29) and Sandy Zirla, who is not yet of legal age, are on trial here. They are accused of robbery and grievous bodily harm. According to lvz.de they are said to have forcibly stolen a cell phone worth around 1000 euros from a 15-year-old, Denis Brugendorf, in Eilenburg have lost weight. The incident, which doesn't go well, involved them throwing the victim to the ground and pulling his cell phone out of his pocket.
To put the events into perspective: Denis himself is in custody for another robbery offense. This entanglement makes the situation even more complicated. During the trial it became clear that Denis and Sandy knew each other from a residential group in Dresden. Denis had asked Sandy for a new cell phone, and she then ordered two cell phones for 1,000 euros each, one of them for him. However, his willingness to pay fell to 60 to 90 euros per month, which ultimately led to conflicts.
The court ruling
In the most recent hearing, Judge Ruben Franzen asked whether the telecommunications company should have issued the contracts to such young people. The situation escalated when Denis refused to hand over the cell phone and ran away. An alert couple who happened to be passing by witnessed this incident and immediately informed the police.
Tobias Krest's defense argues that he did not kick Denis. Interestingly, Judge Franzen did not recognize any robbery and dropped the charges against both. The proceedings have been temporarily discontinued, which means that Tobias Krest has to do 100 hours of community service. Sandy Zirla, on the other hand, will remain in the group home for another nine months, which she accepted.
The context of juvenile crime
A look at juvenile crime in Germany shows that such incidents are unfortunately not isolated cases. In 2024, youth violence reached a peak of around 13,800 cases, more than twice as high as in 2016, as Statista reports. An increase was particularly recorded among young people between 14 and 17 years of age and adolescents between 18 and 20 years of age. The reasons for this are diverse, including psychological stress caused by the Corona measures and the problematic living conditions of young people seeking protection.
The social debate often revolves around the question of how young offenders should be dealt with. While some argue for tougher sanctions, a larger proportion emphasize the need to strengthen preventive measures. In order to prevent criminal lives, the role of child and youth welfare services is often pointed out.
The legal framework, which was discussed in a similar context in the case of a robbery, also shows that juvenile criminal law is often applied, even if in certain situations general criminal law would be worth considering, as in a case documented in strafrechtsiegen.de. Here the applicability of juvenile criminal law for adolescents was affirmed, as the personal situation and development of the defendants were brought to the fore.
In summary, the question remains how Eilenburg and other cities will deal with the growing youth crime and what that means for those affected. The principle that no one under the age of 14 is punished for crimes raises exciting questions, especially when one considers that many young people actually live in difficult circumstances.