Stegner attacks Dobrindt: Asylum refusions illegally!

Stegner attacks Dobrindt: Asylum refusions illegally!

The Federal Minister of the Interior Alexander Dobrindt (CSU) faces growing criticism, in particular after a judgment of the Berlin Administrative Court, which classified the rejection of asylum seekers in border controls as illegal. SPD politician Ralf Stegner emphasized that the SPD insists on humanity and clear legal basis in asylum policy. Dobrindt's approach to arrange increased controls and rejections of migrants is considered a step backwards, in particular by the opposition parties.

The judgment concerns the case of three Somaliers, which were rejected on May 9 after a control by the federal police, even though they had expressed an asylum application. According to the court, Germany has to initiate asylum procedures in its territory and cannot rely on the Dublin Ordinance. In the first two weeks of the reinforced controls, 1676 people were rejected at the borders, which further fueled the public and political conversation about migration policy in Germany.

Dobrindt's reaction to the judgment

Despite the judgment, Dobrindt adheres to his practice of rejections and refers to individual decisions. He emphasizes that the measures are not long -term and there are exceptions for vulnerable groups such as children and pregnant women. Chancellor's head Thorsten Frei (CDU) defends the rejections as part of the migration policy, while the Greens and the union of the police (GdP) express legal concerns.

Stegner criticized that conservative parties, especially the CSU, reject the demands on humanity in asylum policy. The current discussion unfolds against the background of a historically complex asylum policy in Germany that has developed over decades. Germany has been a contracting state of the Geneva Refugee Convention since 1951 and has anchored a far -reaching right to asylum in the Basic Law.

historical context and migration in Germany

In the past few decades, Germany has developed into one of the main clip -in countries for refugees, whereby the asylum procedures are monitored by the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF). At the end of June 2024, around 727,900 people with refugee protection lived in Germany, and over 122 million people worldwide are currently fleeing. The political discussion about asylum and migration therefore remains not only locally, but also internationally relevant.

Conservative reforms of asylum law, including the introduction of safe countries of origin, make it difficult to enforce asylum seekers. This "asylum compromise", which was reached in 1992, limits asylum sayings for entry via safe third countries. This has led to the fact that asylum procedures are often politically controversial and that Germany's absorption capacity is increasingly critically discussed.

summarized, Dobrindt's migration policy is in the field of tension between legal requirements and political requirements, which leads to an intensive debate about the future orientation of asylum policy in Germany. The ruin of humanitarian standards is still discussed from various sides, while the integration of refugees and improving the social infrastructure gain urgency.

For further information on this topic and the development of asylum policy in Germany, see Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger , Tagesspiegel and Bonn Digital .