Dobrindt remains hard: Court decision for asylum deportations devilty!

Dobrindt remains hard: Court decision for asylum deportations devilty!

Frankfurt (Oder), Deutschland - The federal government remains true to its course despite a current court decision and persistent criticism of its migration policy. A few days ago, the Berlin Administrative Court decided that the rejection of three Somalians on the German-Polish border was illegal because the Dublin procedure was not carried out properly. Federal Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt, who commented on the processes in the ARD talk show "Maischberger", sees no danger that federal police officers will be liable for their actions. He emphasizes that the mandate for the actions of the police was formulated by politics and defends the proceedings of the federal authorities with the establishment of an overwhelming situation through migration.

The affected people, two men and a woman from Somalia, were checked by the federal police at the Frankfurt (Oder) train station on May 9th and sent back to Poland on the same day. The federal police justified the rejection by entering a safe third country. This decision was made under Dobrindt's new arrangement, which provided for an intensification of the border controls and included the authorization to reject asylum seekers, unless they were pregnant, children or other vulnerable groups. This regulation had previously been rejected by other federal governments.

court ruling raises questions about

The decision of the administrative court is particularly noteworthy, since it is the first judicial examination of Dobrindt's new regulation on the subject of rejections. The court made it clear that the Federal Government must not rely on a "national emergency", since there was no danger to public security. This contradicts Dobrindt's arguments that affect the existing overwhelming situation with the current migration currents.

opposition politicians criticize that the federal government puts the police officers in a difficult situation and demand immediate rethinking in migration policy. The Greens desire from Dobrindt to withdraw his arrangement immediately, while the police union (GdP) sees its skepticism against the new procedure. Andreas Roßkopf, chairman of the GdP, demands legally confident action by the police without personal liability in the event of illegality.

short -term measures and their consequences

Dobrindt ordered the intensification of border controls on May 7 and enabled the rejection of asylum seekers. However, after the administrative court decided that the Dublin procedure must first be carried out, it is now clear that the actions of the Federal Government are not in accordance with the current European law. In the specific case of the three Somalians, the court found that the Federal Republic cannot simply reject people without complying with the legal requirements. The Greens describe Dobrindt's procedure as a national course that not only violates European law, but also endangers the rights of asylum seekers.

The debate about migration policy and its legal basis will continue to stop. It remains to be seen how the federal government react to the judgment and whether it will adapt its measures to meet the legal requirements.

For more information, the reports of Weser-Kurier href = "https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/innenpolitik/zurueckung-gränn-recht-100.html"> Tagesschau and excellent revealing.