Bavaria raises the alarm: New rules for mentally ill after a knife attack!

Bavaria raises the alarm: New rules for mentally ill after a knife attack!

After the knife attack in Aschaffenburg, the Bavarian State Government plans to tighten the Menania-Hilfe-Aid Act (PsychKHG). Prime Minister Markus Söder announced that new regulations for the accommodation of mentally ill people are being developed. This decision follows the events that have caused a sensation and which are discussed from various social perspectives.

A good four months after the incident, a working group under the direction of the Ministry of Social Affairs checks measures to prevent violence by mentally ill people. This exam is intended to help you get a better understanding of the risks that are based on a very small group of mentally ill people who have an increased risk of acts of violence due to serious illnesses and often in conjunction with alcohol and drug abuse.

a rethinking of the procedure

The Ministry of Social Affairs emphasizes that mentally ill people are generally not more dangerous than the general public and that they are often a victim of violence themselves. In this context, the exchange between security authorities is also discussed. Klaus Holetschek, CSU parliamentary group leader, calls for simpler forced accommodation and a easier exchange of health data between the authorities. However, these suggestions encounter criticism.

The Federal Association of Relatives Menually ill people (BAPK) warns of stigmatization and travels to politicians to ensure decent care for mentally ill people. Heike Peterseit-Zipfel, provisional chairman of the BAPK, urges to avoid reflective demands for more hardness.

The discussion about security and care

The debate about dealing with mentally ill people raises questions about migration policy. The knife attack could possibly have an impact in the way in which mentally ill people are treated in Germany. While Klaus Holetschek emphasizes that not all people with mental illnesses should be stigmatized, he also demands better data exchange to increase security. This leads to a area of ​​tension between the freedom rights of those affected and the security interests of society.

Psychiatrist Peter Brieger comments skeptically about the planned enforcement of the law and emphasizes that help offers and better care for solving the problem. In particular, he warns that the currently long waiting times for psychiatric treatments have to be improved, while forced treatment must be approved by the judgment in order to comply with the legal framework.

stigmatization as a central problem

Another central topic of the discussion is the continued stigmatization of mentally ill people. A book by the Ulm psychiatrist Nicolas Rüsch addresses the far -reaching consequences of discrimination and marginalization and offers comprehensive instructions for various stakeholders, including sick, relatives and specialists. This standard work tries to promote a scientific discourse on the problem and at the same time be understandable for laypersons.

The political and social reactions to mental illnesses show how important it is to advertise in society for understanding and acceptance to ensure adequate treatment and support for those affected.

For more information see: PNP , BR , and Ärzteblatt .