Elon Musk draws consequences: resignation to Chaos at Doge!

Elon Musk draws consequences: resignation to Chaos at Doge!

Washington, USA - Elon Musk laid his position as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), which was surprising for many observers. After only 130 days at the top, this step is not regarded as a withdrawal of power. Under Musk's leadership, Doge had caused significant changes in the administration in a very short time, including the consolidation of federal data and the abolition of important supervisory functions. Al Jazeera reports that Musk plans to use his experience in a private AI company, while he continues to have access to public systems.

The Doge aimed to recreate or dismantle parts of the federal government and started closing diversity programs. Many of Doge's employees had no previous experience in government work. Up to a certain point in time, Doge had already gained access to at least 15 federal authorities, which ensured protests by legislators. ABC News that some laws and Union agreements were questioned by the aggressive approach of nut. This led to legal disputes, including a lawsuit by the National Treasury Employees Union.

conflicts and reactions

The decision to reduce the USA agency for international development (USAI) led to a massive outcry and was stopped by a provisional ban on a federal judge. Like Al Jazera , Musks caused drastic staff, especially at safety-relevant areas. These measures were criticized by war veterans who took care of their health care.

Trump and some Republican legislators, such as House Speaker Mike Johnson, supported Musk and praised his efforts to uncover fraud and waste. However, the Doge was sharply criticized not only by the political right, but also by Democrats. Senators asked for studies on the practices of the Doge, and there were protests outside of affected authorities. Several judicial decisions have already temporarily stopped by Doge, which more than questioned the efficiency of the program. ABC News

a controversial withdrawal

Musk's withdrawal is understood as a lively political process that failed many opportunities for a serious reform in the efficiency of the government. Critics, as in a comment on NZZ , argue that Musk's approach was simply not sustainable and just the best way to get one have a small proportion of the annual government spending.

The effects of its activities also seem to have affected other areas, such as the sales figures of Tesla, which have dropped as a result of Musk's political engagement. It remains to be seen how Musk's next steps will develop outside the government and what teachings are drawn from the Doge initiative.