Chancellor remains hard: asylum seeker rejections despite the court ruling!

Chancellor remains hard: asylum seeker rejections despite the court ruling!

Berlin, Deutschland - The dispute over the rejection of asylum seekers at the German borders has gained intensity in the past few days. While Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt (CSU) supports a policy of rejections, the Berlin Administrative Court ruled that such measures are illegal. Chancellor supports Dobrindt in his position, which he underpinned in the local congress of the German Association of Cities and Municipalities in Berlin with regard to asylum policy. This happens against the background that the number of asylum seekers in Germany has dropped, which increases the relevance of this discussion.

The court ruled that rejections are not permitted without clarification of the responsible EU states. This emerges from a lawsuit by three Somali asylum seekers who wanted to enter Germany from Poland on May 9, but were immediately rejected to Poland. According to the court, asylum seekers must go through a procedure according to the Dublin rules before they can be rejected.

court judgment and reactions

The administrative court found that Germany is obliged to complete the Dublin procedure completely. Interior Minister Dobrindt, on the other hand, described the current asylum system as "dysfunctional" and plans to record despite the judgment in the practice of rejections. He also announced that he wanted to deliver a more detailed reason for the rejections and is planning a main thing.

The decision of the court is inconceivable, and Federal Minister of Justice Stefanie Hubig emphasized the importance of compliance with court decisions. Migration researcher Gerald Knaus sees the concept of rejections as failed and expects the federal government to lose in further legal disputes. The Federal Government calls for the rejection policy per asylum, while the SPD parliamentary group insists on legal solutions.

Dublin procedure and asylum rights

According to the information from the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF), the Dublin procedure is crucial for the responsibility for asylum procedures in EU member states. Based on the Dublin III regulation, which regulates that each asylum application may only be checked by one Member State. The process stipulates that applicants first submit their application in a branch office of the Federal Office or an arrival center and are informed about possible reasons for possible conversation in a personal conversation.

If another Member State is determined as responsible, the relevant file is overlooked there and a transfer is arranged. If this does not take place within the specified deadlines, the responsibility for checking the asylum application passes to Germany. This also applies to people who have previously applied for asylum in another Member State.

The discussion about rejections and the Dublin procedure remains of central importance in view of the current political developments and the ongoing migration problem in Europe. The designated Polish President Karol Nawrocki has already announced that it would introduce controls on the border with Germany, which could also complicate the situation. A common European solution is challenged by experts and politicians to cope with the challenges of migration.

The debate about asylum policy is being pursued, since the position of the Federal Government and the current court decisions could significantly influence the direction of future migration policy measures.

For more information on the Dublin procedure, visit the website of the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees: bamf .

For detailed reporting on current political developments, read the article by Dewezet: Dewezet .

Further insights into the legal aspects of the rejection provides RBB24: rbb24 .