Richter prohibits terrorists for Reichlinger demonstrators

The Munich Administrative Court prohibits Reichling to describe demonstrators against gas drilling as "terrorists".
The Munich Administrative Court prohibits Reichling to describe demonstrators against gas drilling as "terrorists". (Symbolbild/NAG)

Richter prohibits terrorists for Reichlinger demonstrators

In the Upper Bavarian community of Reichling, the Munich Administrative Court took into account on June 6, 2025 to a remarkable case that affects the limits of freedom of expression and the right to demonstrate. An organizer had sued the municipal administration after this demonstrating citizen referred to as "terrorists". The court prohibited the municipality of this term, which can lead to an order money of 10,000 euros, the judgment should not be followed. The decision is temporarily applying for a final decision to be made in the main. According to muenchen.t-online.de , the controversial statement of the community was published and was by Mayor Johannes Johannes Hintersberger (CSU) signed.

The controversy broke out in the context of a large demonstration against planned gas bores, which took place on May 3, 2025, in which several hundred people took to the streets. Before the event, differences of opinion on the organization of the demonstration had already led to tensions. The reference to the protesters as "terrorists" was particularly important, since it not only stumbled into legal but also social discussions about perception and dealing with protests. The Kurier.de Is understood to be understood.

foundation of freedom of assembly

The discussion about freedom of assembly has a long and complex history in Germany. It is rooted in the Enlightenment and anchored in the Basic Law (Article 8 GG). Historically, demonstrations have always played an important role in political arguments. A drastic event was, for example, the shooting of the student Benno Ohnesorg during a protest in 1967, which fundamentally changed the public perception of demonstrations. Then as now, the topic in society is discussed controversially, especially with regard to the limits and regulations that are bound to the right to assembly. bpb.de emphasizes how important these freedoms are for democratic opinion formation.

In view of the ongoing debates on the exercise of freedom of assembly and their legal framework, it remains to be seen how the final decision in the Reichling municipality will be canceled. The legal foundations and social perceptions are at the center of a discussion that is important beyond the local level. The consideration of the events in Reichling could thus have far -reaching implications for future demonstrations and their treatment by the authorities.

Details
OrtReichling, Deutschland
Quellen