Order murder in Dömitz: woman and man sentenced to long -standing imprisonment!

Order murder in Dömitz: woman and man sentenced to long -standing imprisonment!

In the course of a brilliant trial at the Schwerin district court, a 61-year-old woman, together with a 46-year-old man, has been responsible for an arson attack in Dömitz, who fortunately did not end in fatal. According to ndr , the court found that the woman was sentenced to 12 years and 6 months in prison, while her complaints, which was responsible for the execution of the crime, with 10 Years and 6 months got away.

The crime occurred in May 2023 when the man was a motorhome in which the ex-husband of the woman and his new partner and her child were poured over and on fire. Fortunately, the sleeping occupants were able to flee in time, and there was no serious injuries, apart from a flue gas poisoning that the woman and her son had to suffer and required medical treatment.

witness brings crucial information to light

A 44-year-old witness made a decisive contribution to clarifying the crime. In her statements, which were recorded by the Nordkurier Woman spoke. The entire extent of the planning of another arson attack became apparently. The witness had initially hesitated to share her information because she had doubts about the credibility.

These secret records and the testimony of the witness finally meant that the police revised their original acceptance of negligent arson and initiated an investigation due to attempted murder. The two defendants were arrested only in December 2024, long after the crime had happened. The victim of the arson attack also occurs as a co -plaintiff.

a life -threatening plan

The public prosecutor accused the man of having poured and lit the motorhome with fuel. Details became known that the gasoline was bought at a petrol station. The defense of the alleged client denies the accusations and states that the witness's statements are not usable.

The property damage to the motorhome was around 120,000 euros. The next court appointments are already pending and the judgment is expected to fall next July. It remains to be seen whether the burden of proof is sufficient to finally judge the accused.