Insults in the parking lot: Man from Röbel has to pay 2400 euros!

Insults in the parking lot: Man from Röbel has to pay 2400 euros!
A 43-year-old man from Röbel was sentenced to a fine of 2400 euros by the district court on the Müritz after he called on the schedule in several angry breaks. The incidents that occurred between the end of 2023 and early 2024 indicate a deep problem of the accused, who already has a long criminal record with eight entries, including four due to insults and defamation. Especially between December 12, 2023 and the following days, the man was striking when he loudly insulted a acquaintance in a parking lot as a "child maternity" and then sent his landlord several insulting messages in which he drew him as "dirty pig" and "fiesling", like [nordkurier.de] (https://www.nordkurier.de/regional/mueritz/dreckschwein-und-kinderschaenderin-mann- after-wuester-Schimpforgie-Lücke--Chance-chann
Apparently the accused plague money and housing problems that caused him to blame others for his miseries. According to his own statements, he is under considerable pressure and believes that he has learned his lesson. But the prosecutor Ralf Röder warns that such insults do not remain without consequences; You could even lead to a prison sentence if there are further incidents.
brought to the point: insults and their legal consequences
In Germany, insults, slander and defamation fall under criminal law, which is located in Section 188 of the Criminal Code. Depending on the severity, these offenses can be punished with fines or even prison terms of up to three years, which underlines the seriousness of this matter. Political actors in particular have to protect themselves from hiring attacks, because the law provides for a particularly high level of honor protection here, as the [wikipedia] (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gers_Des_politische_lebens_Geichte_Bleidigung ,_%C3%BCBLE_NENGENE_ON_VELEMDE). However, the lawyers must weigh between freedom of expression and insult, which often represents a complex legal question.
An inglorious role also plays formulations that do not go back to real political occasion or discussion. If the defamation is in the foreground, it is a abuse, which is usually not protected in court by freedom of expression. In the past, the Federal Constitutional Court has made it clear that such a weighing up in individual cases can be complex and confusing, because due to its nature, expenses are also worth protecting as long as it is not directed against human dignity, as on [hotsmann.eu] (https://hoesmann.eu/abrlenzung- opinions-und- undeidung/).
The current conviction of the Röbeler man could not only be an isolated case, but also signs of a major social problem, which stands out, especially in times of increasing emotional and polarized discussions. This case could rekindle the debate about dealing with insults and their legal consequences, especially since the number of advertisements against politically active people is increasing.
It remains to be seen whether the 43-year-old actually learns from his experiences or whether he, fueled by further problems, shows relapses into his hurtful behavior. The judge, Roland sponsor, gave him a last chance to make the best of his situation and is optimistic that the punishment works.
Details | |
---|---|
Ort | Röbel, Deutschland |
Quellen |