State Constitutional Court overturns non-transparent budget practices in Saxony-Anhalt
The State Constitutional Court of Saxony-Anhalt ruled that the state parliament disregarded its budget law when making savings in the 2024 budget.

State Constitutional Court overturns non-transparent budget practices in Saxony-Anhalt
On July 1, 2025, a ruling by the State Constitutional Court of Saxony-Anhalt caused a stir. The court ruled that the state parliament's budget rights were violated when drawing up the 2024 state budget. The background is a global underspending of around 437 million euros, which was planned for in the budget, but was determined without clear information about the specific areas for savings. The motion that led to this ruling was made by the Alliance 90/The Greens faction and was successful, while individual motions within this faction were rejected for lack of authority, such as [sachsen-anhalt.de](https://www.sachsen-anhalt.de/bs/pressemitigungen?tx_tsarssinclude_pi1%5Baction%5D=single&tx_ tsarssinclude_pi1%5Bcontroller%5D=Base&tx_tsarssinclude_pi1%5Buid%5D=580138&cHash=1302e5a3efe541f1e60d6d01597013cc) reported.
The decision of December 14, 2023 on the 2024 budget should provide for savings of over 400 million euros through global reduced spending. But the court found that this practice was not only problematic but illegal. The argument was based on the principle of budget clarity and truthfulness, which states that all income and expenses must be transparently listed in the budget. At this point, the state government apparently made a mistake: the proposed approach for global underspending was viewed as not being sufficiently well-founded, as empirical values would have indicated lower amounts, which mdr.de supports.
The consequences of the verdict
The court's ruling makes it clear that the assessment of global underspending is not fundamentally inadmissible. However, these must be determined realistically. The Ministry of Finance in Magdeburg responded by emphasizing that the judgment had no impact on the current budget, but that the reasons for the judgment would be examined closely. Kay Barthel, President of the State Audit Office, supported the decision and highlighted the need for clarity about the savings in order to increase transparency in the budget, as magdeburg-klickt.de reports.
Olaf Meister, parliamentary manager of the Greens, said that this action in court was necessary to end the lack of transparency in the state budget. The currently planned gap between income and expenditure of 437 million euros amounts to almost three percent of the overall budget and shows how much the pressure situation in Saxony-Anhalt could encourage a rethink. From now on, the government must transparently demonstrate where it is making cuts and the criteria according to which these decisions are made through its relationship to global underspending.
An outlook on fiscal discipline
The judgment has a clear message for everyone involved - a house number on paper alone is not enough. The state government must show that it has a good knack for proper financial management. The court has made it clear that a blanket approach will no longer be accepted in the future; everything must be understandable and comprehensible. The Greens then called for a comprehensive revision of the budget, including more precise details of savings points, in order to ensure the legality and transparency of Saxony-Anhalt's financial policy in the future.
The coming months are crucial for the country's fiscal policy. The relevant changes must certainly come to the table. Saxony-Anhalt faces the challenge of increasing transparency and regaining the trust of the population. It remains to be hoped that everyone involved, from the state parliament to the executive branch, will develop a good feeling for how to manage taxpayers' money in a sensible and understandable way.