Magdeburg's head of the public order office under criticism: trust in danger?

Magdeburg's head of the public order office under criticism: trust in danger?

Rumors about the public order office are simmering in the city administration of Magdeburg. The head of the public order office recently said that he no longer saw a way out and felt overwhelmed. This raises questions about the support and backing of the city. A comment from MDR emphasizes that there is a noticeable lack of support, which makes those responsible appear in an unfavorable light.

The current situation could possibly be interpreted as an attempt to shirk responsibility. Given this, there are calls in the room for a review of the disciplinary process, which may appear unnecessary. Nevertheless, the return of the head of the public order office to a secure position within a very short time becomes clear, which further increases the concerns about the trust of the city council, mayor, employees and citizens in the people involved.

Responsibility and pressure in the public service

The responsibility that such a position entails requires critical self-reflection and an awareness of the pressures that officers face. According to the regulations of civil service law, civil servants in the public service are obliged to be particularly loyal and abide by the law. Violations of these official duties can ultimately result in disciplinary proceedings, as [Herfurtner Law Firm](https://kanzlei-herfurtner.de/helferrecht-disciplinary procedure/) reports.

Disciplinary proceedings will be initiated if there is suspicion of misconduct. This can arise from official misconduct, criminal proceedings or complaints. It provides for various steps, starting with the initiation of the procedure, through the investigation process, through to the conclusion and possible disciplinary measures.

The course of a disciplinary procedure

Such a process includes several phases. First, the facts are determined, taking both incriminating and exculpatory facts into account. The official has the opportunity to comment and, if necessary, seek legal advice. As explained by [Hallermann](https://ulrich-hallermann.com/disciplinary procedures-at-officials/), off-duty behavior can also constitute an official offense if it affects trust in the official.

If, after the investigation, there is a need for disciplinary action, there may be various consequences, up to and including removal from service - this is the most serious measure. Interestingly, even a retired civil servant can be subject to disciplinary action, which underlines the seriousness of these procedures.

Conclusion

These developments shed light on the challenges of civil service law and the responsibility that public service providers bear to the community. Citizens' trust is essential and is put to the test in such situations. Ultimately, it remains to be seen how the situation will develop for the head of the public order office and the city administration, and whether those responsible will be able to meet the expectations placed on them.