Hungary's new legislation: Is there a risk to dual citizens of robbery?

Hungary's new legislation: Is there a risk to dual citizens of robbery?

Ungarn - Hungary Parliament has passed a controversial law that enables the government to temporarily deprive citizenship of double citizens. This step, which was announced on June 11, 2025, falls into a context of increasing political repression under Prime Minister Viktor Orbán. The law is particularly directed against people who have citizenship of a non-EU country and is interpreted as an instrument to combat reviews at the government, such as Dewezet.de reported.

According to the new legal regulations, the withdrawal of citizenship can last up to ten years if the person concerned endangers the "public security or national interests" of Hungary. An example of possible affected people are Hungarian-American double citizens who work in human rights organizations. The government reserves the right to abolish citizenship if the person acts in the interest of a stranger or organization.

political motivation and criticism

Critics of the law describe it as a repressive measure that clearly aims to silence unpleasant voices and independent civil organizations. Orbán and its government justify this procedure by the fact that such critics could harm the country. However, this argument is controversial and arouses concerns about the restriction of freedom of expression in Hungary, which contributes to a further division within society.

International is a temporary abolition of citizenship unusual. Usually citizenship is permanently withdrawn or the person concerned voluntarily does without it. The new regulation shows how one -sided and repressive Hungary political landscape has become under Orbán and attracts both national and international criticism.

The framework of human rights

In a broader context, these developments contradict globally recognized human rights. The general explanation of human rights, which was passed by the UN General Assembly in 1948, ensures the duty of the states to respect and protect human rights. Nevertheless, worldwide statistics show that only three percent of the world population lived in states in 2019 that fully guarantee these rights, while persistent human rights violations, especially in countries such as Venezuela and Syria, are widespread. The bpb.de The gap between the theoretical demands on human rights and their practical implementation is enorm.

In Hungary, it can be observed how populist tendencies are increasingly undermining the achievements in the field of human rights. This area of ​​tension shows that the enforcement of human rights requires a social and political argument inside a state. The Hungarian law could be regarded as a crisal stalization of this challenge, since it relies on the game in order to secure political control and power.

The concerns about the decline in democratic norms in Hungary are not only relevant for national politics, but also raise international issues on the legal protection of human rights. In view of the changes in Hungarian legislation, the community and international institutions have to deal more intensively with the mechanisms to protect human rights in order to counteract such developments