First payment cards for refugees in Suhl: a step or an obstacle?
First payment cards for refugees in Suhl: a step or an obstacle?
In the initial reception facility in Suhl, the first state payment cards for refugees saw the light of day. According to Welt , the distribution of the maps began at the end of June, and Frank Roßner, President of the Thuringian State Administration Office, emphasized that these cards are reliable and transparent Means to ensure. This already uses the payment cards in several Thuringian counties, which draws attention to a new model that was developed by both municipalities and the country.
But what exactly are these payment cards? The idea behind them is to enable refugee people in Germany easier access to support by restricting cash payouts and reducing the administrative effort. But not everyone is positive about this innovation. The Refugee Council Thuringia e.V. expresses concerns and calls for discriminatory payment of social benefits. The Refugee Council criticizes the payment cards as a symbolical act that also makes the life of life of those affected.
challenges and criticism
A central problem are the technical and bureaucratic hurdles that can make the use of the cards complicated. According to the Netzpolitik there are restrictions on the withdrawal of cash and the type of business that can be used with the cards. Those affected report a cash limit of 50 euros, which is often not sufficient to cover basic needs.
Another aspect that contributes to the discussion are the exchange points in Thuringia, where refugee shopping vouchers can exchange cash. These exchanges are legally harmless and make it possible to use the existing means more flexibly. There are currently exchanging points in cities such as Erfurt and Jena. Even if this seems a practical approach, the question remains whether such solutions can alleviate the difficulties of those affected in the long term.
regional differences
While some districts of Thuringia have already decided to use the payment cards, other cities, such as Münster and Potsdam, reject the introduction. These differences in the implementation show the various views and challenges that the municipalities face. Resistance Against the payment cards often comes from those who believe that these additional bureaucratic requirements restrict the rights of the refugees.
It remains to be seen whether the payment cards are ultimately a welcome aid or a bureaucratic obstacle. The discussion about it is far from over and it will be exciting to observe how this system develops and whether it can actually do justice to the needs of the refugees.
Details | |
---|---|
Ort | Suhl, Deutschland |
Quellen |
Kommentare (0)