Bomb threats in Germany: Process against 20-year-olds in Stuttgart!

Bomb threats in Germany: Process against 20-year-olds in Stuttgart!

Stuttgart, Deutschland - in Stuttgart is a 20-year-old man on trial who is charged with the shipping of bomb threats. According to bnn.de , the accused has granted a total of 51 threatening emails to universities, schools and authorities throughout Germany. His lawyer explains that the young man was looking for attention and recognition. In autumn 2023 he had the threats sent to become public.

A 21-year accomplice from Hamburg was accused of supporting him to send him to send the letters. Both men know each other exclusively from the Internet, and the older defendant has not yet commented on the allegations. The fact that the threatening emails were sent not only in Baden-Württemberg, but also in seven other federal states.

affected institutions and police operations

The affected institutions in Baden-Württemberg include several schools, the University of Stuttgart, the Kit Karlsruhe, the police university in Villingen-Schwenningen and the Israelite community in Ulm. The threatening letters have led to significant police operations and evacuations nationwide, with schools, media houses and messages affected, Tageschau.de .

The public prosecutor has not found a terrorist background, but sees the risk that public order has been disrupted. The accused must answer for the disorder of public peace by threatened crimes. According to Section 126 (2) of the Criminal Code, such actions can be punished with a prison sentence of up to three years or a fine. The aim is to protect public peace, and a concrete hazard does not have to be proven to justify a punishment.

legal consequences and liability

The legal consequences are far -reaching. The sender of threatening mail could not only have to pay for the punishment for disruption to public peace, but also for the high costs caused by the police operations, since these are due to the behavior of the perpetrator.

according to dejure.org the pretense of an upcoming illegal act, against better knowledge, is punished. This makes it clear that the offenses are not only limited to sending the threats, but also the associated false alarms of the security forces can result in legal consequences.

Overall, the case shows how serious and comprehensive the legal measures against such threats are, and makes it clear that the public interest in security and order enjoys protection.