Dispute between the mayor and the Greens: Who pays for clarification?
Dispute between the mayor and the Greens: Who pays for clarification?
In the picturesque Malchow it is boiling again in the political landscape. The differences between Mayor René Putzar and city representative Heike Stein have now come to the center of the discussion, especially with regard to a planned mediation discussion that should be legally accompanied. While the question of costs throws its shadow about the city council, the minds seem to be heated and the fronts have hardened. Uckermarkurier reports that the problem has been in existence for a long time.
In the last meeting of the city council, an application for assumption of costs for a conversation between the two opponents was discussed. Heike Stein (Bündnis 90/Die Grünen) suggested the law firm Schütte & Horstkotte & Partner, which the city should legally support. The estimated costs of 600 euros should be financed from the city treasury. CDU city representative Michael Meyer was open to the application and even advocated determining a cost limit of 1,000 euros. But the project did not find the approval of everyone, which only tightened the tense situation.
blockade and criticism
Mario Warnke from the alliance for Malchow/Open voter list clearly spoke out against the application and instead recommended that each faction names a confidant to clarify the differences in opinion internally. In the end, the application for assuming costs was rejected, which caused disappointment with Heike Stein. She criticized the blockage keeping of the mayor, who in his argumentation pointed out the complexity of applications regarding the inspection of the files. Mayor Putzar considered the request as not legal and pointed out that there was no legal claim to the financing of the conversation.
An exciting aspect is that Putzar rejected the Stein law firm as a conversation manager, since it was already working in a trial against the Stein family. Instead, Rickert Reeps, the president of the city council, was proposed as a neutral moderator. But Stein also rejected this proposal and expressed concerns about a possible bias. The conflict is not new; He has a long history that also includes an administrative court proceedings that was decided in favor of the administration.
right claim to inspection of files
A central point in this argument is the topic of inspection of files. It is not uncommon for disputes over the complete or partial refusal of inspection in documents. According to the applicable laws, mandate carriers have a legal right to inspect files as long as the required quorums are met. The right of indicators is considered an important tool to control the administration and to obtain their own information from the members of the city council. If this claim is violated, the mandate providers are open to local constitutional dispute before the administrative court. However, these procedures result in costs that the municipality usually has to bear, according to the provisions of the municipal code and the district regulations. Lawyer for Local Law indicates the importance of this right.
In the future,will remain aware of how the conflict in Malchow will develop and whether an agreement in this complex and tense situation is possible. The political actors face the challenge of finding a solution that is in the best interest of the city and its citizens. There is a lot of thing!
Details | |
---|---|
Ort | Malchow, Uckermark, Deutschland |
Quellen |
Kommentare (0)