Fire on the scrap system in Friedland: 100,000 euros in damage and arson?

Fire on the scrap system in Friedland: 100,000 euros in damage and arson?

On Monday afternoon, a devastating fire broke out on a scrap facility in Friedland, in the Mecklenburg Lake District district. Around 83 fire brigade was committed to fighting the fire that had broken out in a warehouse. The damage amounts to around 100,000 euros, which is a significant burden for the operators. Three employees were on site during the incident and initially tried to extinguish the fire independently. A 49-year-old worker had to be taken to the hospital due to possible flue gas poisoning, which also underlines the drama of the incident. Investigations indicate the suspicion of arson, which makes the case complicated, because in such situations the responsibility for the costs incurred could play a crucial role, as the time reports.

A recently published case from another community shows how serious fire costs are taken. There, the sum of 9,155.71 euros was invoiced for a fire service deployment after a deliberately laid out fire was created in his restaurant. Although the responsible behavior of the restaurant operator could not be proven, the municipality argued that in cases of intended damage, cost reimbursement could be requested. The administrative court finally decided in favor of the innkeeper, which shows that the legal framework for such incidents is very differentiated. Because according to the fire brigade law, municipalities may only request costs if the damage has been deliberately or grossly negligent, as [wea.de] (https://www.weka.de/ordungsamt-werbeamt/wer-traegt-die-eines-feuerwehr Oeters-Bei-brandstiftung/) explained.

Legal framework for fire service costs

If we look at the legal aspects, it is important to understand how different the regulations can be depending on the federal state. While most fire brigade operations that serve the protection of people are borne by the municipalities, the law provides for the cause of the cause of the junky facility, as it could be the case in the case of the scrap system. This could turn out to be a bitter awakening for those responsible, since the effort of fire brigade operations is considerable. When using a fire truck, as an example from Berlin shows, each assignment can quickly bring costs of 4.70 euros per minute and more. It is all the more decisive that the legal responsibility is clearly regulated and that everyone concerned is well informed about possible consequences, such as [lawyer funding.de] (https://anwalt-auspfreukkunft.de/magazin/leben/freizeit-alltag/muss-man-feuerwehreinsaeta-selbst- figures). In the end, the question remains who pays the costs for the fire service, even in the case of the fire in Friedland if the suspicion of arson hardened. It will be exciting to see how the investigation progresses and in this case the municipality can claim the costs from the causers. While the assumption of costs in the event of intentionally brought -up operations is legally well established, there is also scope, for example, in the event of gross negligence. The matter could therefore still take some legal hurdles, while everyone involved hopes that the case will clarify quickly and for everyone affected.