Hansa Rostock loses the arbitral tribunal: Disclosed lawsuit against DFB!

Hansa Rostock loses the arbitral tribunal: Disclosed lawsuit against DFB!

Rostock, Deutschland - The excitement about the league game between Hansa Rostock and the SpVgg Unterhaching still has legal aftermath. As reported kicker.de, the permanent arbitral tribunal has rejected the lawsuit of the third division club Hansa Rostock. Rostock had appealed against the cancellation of the game, which was originally supposed to take place on March 1st, and then called the arbitral tribunal. The committee found that Hansa's arguments were inadmissible and unfounded.

The cancellation of the game had become necessary because the Unterhaching sports park was closed by the municipality at short notice. This failure was regarded by Hansa Rostock as the culpable behavior of the hosts. The DFB had canceled the game a few days before the scheduled appointment because a missing security concept made it impossible to issue leaga3-online.de.

frustration about the decision

Despite the healthy sporting success in the catch -up game on May 7, which Hansa won 2-0, the club did not want to leave the lawsuit. Previously, a catch -up date for April 29 had been scheduled, but due to the term, it was postponed to May 7th. "We wanted to make it clear that this was an inadequate situation," said the unmistakable word of Rostock.

In the lawsuit, Hansa demanded that the encounter should have been scored 2-0 for Rostock regardless of the later outcome. However, the arbitral tribunal rejected this claim. This not only confirmed the previous decisions of the DFB Federal Court, but also clarified that incorrect assessments of arbitrators that affect the sporting are not contested. This results from the basics of sporting jurisdiction, which is also discussed in the book "Team Sport Management: A comprehensive and interdisciplinary consideration" published by Springer Gabler, as bispsburf.de

outlook for further steps

Now the question is whether Hansa Rostock will appeal to the judgment of the arbitral tribunal. After all, all instances within the DFB are exhausted with the decision. In this case, the constant arbitral tribunal, as a neutral instance, has more than made its independence from the association courts.

The entire situation illustrates how important it is for all sports clubs to adhere to the guidelines and deadlines in order to avoid similar legal disputes in the future. Hansa can only hope that the next games are less affected by such uncertainties.