OLG Naumburg: In the future, gender in judgments inadmissible!

OLG Naumburg: In the future, gender in judgments inadmissible!

The case that this decision is based affects a man who was affected by a speed of 480 euros due to a speed exceeding. The district judge in Dessau had used gender -neutral terms such as "data subject" and "expert person" in the formulation of the judgment. However, the OLG Naumburg primarily highlighted this decision due to defects in terms of content, which included a lack of information on the calibration of the measuring device and traffic monitoring.

gender -friendly language and their challenges

Another focus of the General Prosecutor's Office (Gensta) was the use of gender -neutral formulations. She described them as "Ridikül" and criticized that they seem impersonal and did not respect the identity of those involved. The court largely shared this view and found that there is no room for linguistic experiments in judgments. The Gensta called for a clear language that does justice to the duty of care in the verification of the judgment; An opinion that is increasingly high in many legal circles, as Jura.cc

viewed in a larger context, the decision of the OLG Naumburg is not alone. The topic of gender is also very controversial. There are different approaches to gender language, be it through the visualization of both genders or through gender -neutral formulations. The unclear application of gender stars or similar spellings is critically seen by established institutions such as the Council for German Spelling. Therefore, the question arises: How far can language be experimental in the legal context without losing the meaning of clarity? This dilemma also faces companies and public administrations that have to move between legal requirements and the intelligibility of communication, as the