Ex-Bundesliga professional Rydlewicz banned from the house: What's behind it?
René Rydlewicz is banned from Energie Cottbus due to possible involvement in the transfer of the talent Linus Güther.

Ex-Bundesliga professional Rydlewicz banned from the house: What's behind it?
A commotion in the football scene: Rene Rydlewicz-Gubanow, who used to play for Hansa Rostock and played over 278 Bundesliga games, has now been banned from the house by Energie Cottbus. This drastic measure was announced by President Sebastian Lemke in an official letter to the former player and coach. The club has not communicated the exact reason for the ban, but there are allegations that Rydlewicz was involved in the transfer of the young talent Linus Güther to Union Berlin. Rydlewicz himself denies any involvement and is surprised by the situation
.
Where is the dispute going? Linus Güther, who made his debut for the DFB juniors in May, has already signed a contract with Union Berlin. The young player is recognized as a great talent and also has a kit deal with Adidas. According to information from Energie Cottbus, he should have a legally clear contract until 2028, which was signed by his parents. It looks like the dispute over his transfer could potentially end up in court if the differences cannot be reconciled. Rydlewicz, on the other hand, takes a clear position: “I was not involved in the transfer,” is his statement, which puzzles not only the public but also the club management of Energie Cottbus and raises the question of what will happen next with youth training.
A shadow over youth development
The Güther case highlights the problems in youth football, which are not only evident in Cottbus. In the amateur sector there are often disputes about transfers and contracts, which also affect young players. In certain regions, including Saarland, exchange contracts in the youth sector are a sensitive issue. The Saarland Football Association allows transferring clubs to ban players without giving reasons, which leads to considerable uncertainty for those affected. In comparison, the question arises as to how far those responsible want to go in training talent without endangering the rights of the players.
The transfer of talent like Güther shows the difficulties that clubs face. “Having a good hand” is often easier said than done, especially when contracts and legal issues come into play. With its regulation on “training compensation”, the DFB at least provides an incentive for the clubs that promote their talents. But here too there is resistance and disagreements that could outgrow possible legal action by the club's top management.
For Rydlewicz and his son Oskar Gubanow, who is also moving to Union Berlin next season, it remains to be seen how the situation will develop. The combination of parents, contracts and club life now leads to questions that are important beyond Cottbus.
At a time when football is characterized by increasingly quick decisions, fans remain hopeful that a fair solution will be reached - both for the players and for the clubs. What remains is the uncertainty and the question: How much power do the clubs actually have over the future of young talent?
After all, it is clear that football is more than just a game; it is a business – and with business comes challenges.
Image reports about the stay-at-home order while Day24 illuminates the backgrounds. Additional information about the challenges in youth football is provided Sports show.