Majority in the state parliament: AfD prohibition proceedings are now being checked!
Majority in the state parliament: AfD prohibition proceedings are now being checked!
In the state parliament of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, a noticeable majority for a procedure for the prohibition test of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) has been shown. The reason for these developments was a controversial debate, which was initiated by the factions SPD and left. These require the state government to check measures to protect democracy that could possibly lead to a ban on party. An application that was coordinated on June 25, 2025 received support from 40 MPs, while 24 spoke out and seven abstained from the voice.
This step takes place in parallel to a judicial review, which has the classification of the AfD as a secure right -wing extremist. This classification was pronounced on May 2, 2025 by the constitutional protection. However, the process remains interrupted for the time being, since the AfD filed a lawsuit against the decision and an urgent application is on the Cologne Administrative Court. The authority has suspended the public announcement of this classification and has given a statement of recovery, which should enable a calm examination of the legal situation until a decision is made. The Deutschlandfunk reports that the expert opinion includes over 1000 pages and contains information in need of intelligence.
political rhetoric and resistance
In the debate, AfD parliamentary group leader Nikolaus Kramer expressed sharp criticism of the government parties. He sees the classification as legally controversial and describes the protection of the constitution as a political instrument and censorship authority. This negative attitude is underpinned by the new draft law of his party, which is intended to prevent the publication of the annual reports of the State Constitution Protection. In this context, voices from the left remind of the experiences from the Weimar Republic and emphasize the need for proactive measures in order to address a possibly emerging risk for democracy.
The accusation is particularly explosive that the AfD represents a pejorative world view, which was vehemently brought up by SPD parliamentary group leader Julian Barlen. A central point of criticism is the enemy attitude of the AfD towards people with a history of migration, which is reflected in both campaign speeches and in official statements. According to sociologist Matthias Quent, there are signs of radicalization on the party leadership, which could favor the risk of further normalization of right -wing extremist rhetoric. The protection of the constitution is precisely documenting these developments and refers to public statements by AfD officials, such as Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla, which are crucial for classification as a right-wing extremist.
legal implications and further steps
Legally, the classification also follows the associated effects on state party financing. If a high classification of the AfD as constitutional by the Federal Constitutional Court, civil servants could also be subjected to disciplinary measures with AfD party book. Right -wing experts explain that a party ban can only be requested by the Bundestag, Federal Council or the Federal Government, which further increases the explosiveness of the topic. A party ban procedure is considered an important tool of defensive democracy, which some MPs do not want to do without. In summary, it should be noted that the developments related to the AfD and the role of the protection of the constitution are highly complex and politically charged. Debates of this kind are the breeding ground for far -reaching social discussions, which are of great relevance, especially in the present time. A look at the background of the right -wing extremists shows that civil society vigilance and political conversations are indispensable. The Protection of the Constitution in his current report unequivocally made it clear that the fight against right -wing extremism is more necessary than ever.| Details | |
|---|---|
| Ort | Schwerin, Deutschland |
| Quellen | |