CSU rejects left-wing nomination: Reichinnek controversial for secret service supervision!

CSU rejects left-wing nomination: Reichinnek controversial for secret service supervision!

Vorpommern-Rügen, Deutschland - The dispute over the nomination of Heidi Reichinnek as a new member of the parliamentary control committee (PKGR) to monitor the secret services takes on. Today the CSU speaks up with a clear resistance to this proposal. Alexander Hoffmann, the state group leader of the CSU, describes the nomination of the left-wing parliamentary group leader as an outrageous party political provocation. This reports Rnd .

Hoffmann emphasizes that the members of the PKGR belong to the central security architecture of Germany and therefore urgently need qualified staff. Cooperation with the left is unthinkable for him, which again illustrates the political boundaries between the political groups. It is particularly explosive that Reichinnek is controversial in the Union, not least because of her sharp criticism of Chancellor Friedrich Merz (CDU). In order to enforce the nomination, the left are dependent on voices of the Union, which should reduce the chances of a choice of controversial parliamentary group leader.

secret services and their supervision

But what does the PKGR actually do so central to the German security architecture? In essence, it is about that there are several intelligence services in Germany that have to be under parliamentary control. This control is necessary to protect the rule of law and prevent abuse. The most important services include the Federal Intelligence Service (BND), which operates information abroad, and the protection of the constitution, which focuses on internal security and monitors extremist efforts. The military shielding service (MAD) is also responsible for security policy issues of the Bundeswehr and has an eye on military properties.

How the bpb , the control of intelligence services in democracies is a fundamental component of the rule of law. This supervision differs fundamentally from the undemocratic methods that are common in dictatorships, where intelligence agencies can often act without legal barriers. This can be seen in the fascinating but also worrying history of the espionage and the procurement of information, which in Germany is characterized by historical examples such as the Gestapo or the Stasi.

political benevolence?

The strategic nomination of Reichinnek now also raises the question of whether such decisions are useful in the current political situation. In the past, the left has often pointed out the grievances and challenges of the German security authorities; Now she is faced with the challenge of filling a place in the PKGR that is traditionally characterized by a broad parliamentary consensus.

In this heated debate, it can be refrained from that the project to bring Reichinnek to the control committee is faced with numerous hurdles. It remains to be seen whether the left can mobilize its support sufficiently. The only thing that is certain is that with such a sensitive topic as monitoring the secret services, a broad support is required in order not to endanger the trust of the citizens.