No terror, just revenge: GBA stops Magdeburg Christmas market murder trial
Federal Prosecutor General in Magdeburg does not rate the attack on the Christmas market as a subversive act; Perpetrator acts out of personal frustration.

No terror, just revenge: GBA stops Magdeburg Christmas market murder trial
The trial against Taleb A., the alleged perpetrator of the terrible attack on the Magdeburg Christmas market in December 2024, continues to raise many questions. The Federal Prosecutor General (GBA) recently decided not to take over the proceedings. This decision, which has no connection with state protection, is met with a lot of criticism and incomprehension. Although Taleb A. apparently acted for personal reasons, the shadow of the crime and the number of those affected cannot be easily ignored. MDR reports that the GBA sees no signs of subversive terrorism, although the act cost six people their lives and left hundreds injured.
On December 20, 2024, Taleb A. raced through the Christmas market in a rental car, killing five women between the ages of 45 and 75 as well as a nine-year-old boy and injuring numerous others. According to the Naumburg Public Prosecutor's Office, charges of six counts of murder and attempted murder of 338 other people were filed. These tragic events cannot simply be dismissed on the basis of personal frustrations. After daily news Taleb A. prepared for the crime over several weeks and acted alone, without support or accomplices.
Personal motives and legal disputes
The motivation for Taleb A.'s crime appears to lie in a years-long dispute with the Secular Refugee Aid Association in Cologne. Despite his threats against the German population, these were not classified as politically motivated. Lawyer Petra Küllmei, who represents some of those affected, expresses concern about this decision by the GBA and sees a clear political context in the act. Many who survived that terrible night see this exclusion as a degradation and do not want to be seen as apolitical victims.
Psychiatric reports are of paramount importance in the case. Taleb A. is described as a pronounced narcissist who lacks empathy and who has repeatedly provoked conflicts in the past. A colleague had already expressed concerns about Taleb A.'s condition before the attack. The Magdeburg Regional Court also found in its examination that the perpetrator profile could certainly justify an assessment of terrorism endangering the state, but was not accepted by the GBA.
The judicial context
A temporary courtroom is currently being prepared to accommodate the trial, which is scheduled for completion in September 2025. While Taleb A. is in custody, a psychiatric report is being prepared to conclusively clarify his guilt. He had not consumed any alcohol during the crime, but the question of his mental state still remains. Studies show that in Germany less than half of the perpetrators of violent and sexual crimes are actually assessed, which significantly limits the options for prevention.
Overall, the process navigates through a complex web of personal, legal and social issues. The audience, the media coverage and those affected themselves are excited to see how this case will continue to be heard and what lessons can be learned from it for security in the future.