21-year-old offends police officers at Stendal station-resistance!

21-year-old offends police officers at Stendal station-resistance!

In the early Sunday morning, July 13th, the federal police at Stendal station was called for a special commitment. At 5:50 a.m., the officers met a 21-year-old woman who was sleeping on platform one in the waiting module. When the emergency services gently aroused her to inquire about her identity, the young woman started an rude tone and refused to provide any information about herself. Despite multiple requests, the police were unable to find an ID or other identification features, which made the situation more escalating. As Magdeburg clicks, the woman was ultimately taken to the agency where she made considerable resistance.

In the context of this resistance, the woman not only made a verbally speak. She stepped against an entrance door and threw a glass drinking bottle to the ground, which broke it and left cocoa traces. The women's aggression led to the officials to act according to the provisions of Section 113 of the Criminal Code, which regulates the resistance to enforcement officers. In such a case, the perpetrator makes himself punishable if he resisted with violence or threats with violence, as [anwalt.de] (https://www.anwalt.de/rechtstipps/widersstand-Färgebeamte-113-stgb-Wann-Werd-and-wie-- koenne-sich--defendigen-247012.html).

dismissal and further ads

After the identity of the woman was found using a fingerprint scanner, it turned out that she had no trip intentions. Instead, she received a dismissal for the Stendal train station. Nevertheless, she stubbornly refused to leave the place, which again enabled the officials to enforce their command violence. The woman was instructed about the possible legal consequences of her behavior, including trespassing. In this situation, too, the young woman showed little insight and continued her physical and aggressive behavior, which ultimately led to further advertisements.

Such incidents are not exceptional. Similar situations occurred in Stuttgart, where a 25-year-old Romanian citizen resisted on July 2 against the federal police because he was expelled from the station. These cases illustrate the challenges that the emergency services face when it comes to maintaining public order and enforcing house rights.

Legal consequences and resistance to enforcement officers

Based on experience and legal basis, it becomes clear that resistance to enforcement officers is a serious offense that can be punished with sensitive punishments. According to Section 113 of the Criminal Code, anyone who resists when performing a service is resistant when performing a service. In particularly severe cases, the punishment between six months and up to five years can be imprisoned.

The punishments can vary depending on how the situation is evaluated and what kind of resistance was carried out. Experts recommend checking the legality of the measures and, if necessary, taking legal action to build a defense if you get into a similar situation. An unexpected event like this could have considerable consequences for affected people.

The reports of such incidents show how important it is to respect cooperation with the authorities and not to endanger public security. This happens not only in the interests of the civil servants, but also in the interest of all citizens who rely on the safe and proper handling of situations in public space.