Administrative proceedings against AfD politicians: Secret about Facebook post!

Transparenz: Redaktionell erstellt und geprüft.
Veröffentlicht am

Administrative proceedings against AfD politician Jannik Schreiber in northwest Mecklenburg for violating confidentiality rules.

Ordnungsverfahren gegen AfD-Politiker Jannik Schreiber in Nordwestmecklenburg wegen Verstoßes gegen Geheimhaltungsregeln.
Administrative proceedings against AfD politician Jannik Schreiber in northwest Mecklenburg for violating confidentiality rules.

Administrative proceedings against AfD politicians: Secret about Facebook post!

In Carlow, regulatory proceedings against AfD politician Jannik Schreiber are causing a stir. The second deputy of the district council president Thomas Grote (CDU) hit the headlines after a post on Facebook from a non-public meeting of the northwest Mecklenburg district committee became known. The content of the post, which has now been deleted, referred to a vote on refugee accommodation in Gadebusch and could constitute a violation of confidentiality rules. According to Ostsee-Zeitung, the publication of voting results from non-public meetings is generally prohibited.

Schreiber, who is currently waiting for allegations against his party colleague Jürgen Gaburek to be clarified, does not comment on the ongoing proceedings. The purpose of the non-public meetings of the district committee is to prepare confidential resolutions for the district council - information that is only accessible to elected local politicians. The local constitution makes it clear that the votes can be viewed online, but not the resolutions passed in closed meetings.

Legal framework

The issue of confidentiality in political committees is not only explosive in northwest Mecklenburg. An example from Baden-Württemberg underlines the problem. There, a citizen sued for access to the minutes of a non-public council meeting, but the administrative court ruled that there was no right to access these meetings. The Kanzlei Hauptmann-Uhl & Colleagues determined that the regulations of the municipal code take precedence over the information requirement of the State Freedom of Information Act in order to maintain confidentiality.

In this context, the regulatory proceedings against Jannik Schreiber are certainly relevant. This procedure offers the district council president the opportunity to regulate unrest during meetings. However, given what has happened so far, it seems unlikely that Schreiber will face any far-reaching consequences since he deleted the post in question as quickly as possible.

A look at the future

How the situation will develop for Schreiber remains to be seen. The request for information was initially directed to the district council president, but remained unanswered. Political events and meetings behind closed doors are often a hot topic, as they quickly agitate the minds of citizens who have an interest in clear and transparent communication.

Overall, this incident shows how complex the issue of transparency in local politics is and how important it is to protect the rights of citizens without endangering the necessary confidentiality. One thing is certain: the coming weeks could bring exciting developments.