Spirito thief in Brandenburg: Police are looking for witnesses!

Spirito thief in Brandenburg: Police are looking for witnesses!

Brandenburg, Deutschland - Again it is about a brazen theft in a supermarket that keeps the police busy. On October 24, 2024 at 9:50 p.m., a suspected thief stole spirits worth around 240 euros. The criminal police have now published a surveillance video to clarify the identity of the man about 35 to 45 years old. At the time of the crime, the searched was covered with a black hoodie from the Puma brand, gray jogging pants and a black backpack. The image material shows the very slim man and could be crucial to grasp it. Information can be given to the Oberhavel Police Inspection at 03301-8510 or via the Significance of the Police of the State of Brandenburg.

But what does the use of video recordings mean in the case of theft? And what about the rights of the employees? In the professional environment, valuable utensils and money often disappear from the coffee cheese. Many employers are unsettled and use video surveillance to convict suspects. However, as the German craft newspaper reports, the legal situation can be complicated. A lawyer warns that the use of cameras can be problematic without prior measures. It is important to obtain legal Expertise before picking up the camera - especially when it comes to the personal rights of the employees. This leads us to an example from practice: An employer quit an employee due to suspicion of theft of spirits. However, the video recordings that were supposed to underpin this suspicion were rejected as unusable

.

legal framework conditions

The Federal Labor Court in Erfurt has decided in a current judgment that employers may use video material as evidence, but under certain conditions. The video surveillance must be suspected and limited in time in order not to violate the fundamental right to informational self -determination. Especially in the context of theft at the workplace, it is crucial that other reconnaissance means are exploited before the camera speaks. In a case in which a seller was terminated without notice, the proof by video recordings was rejected by a court because the data should have been deleted. This shows the close balance between employer interests and the rights of the employees - an area that needs to be carefully navigated to avoid legal problems.

In the current discussion about video surveillance at work, it is important to maintain transparency and fairness. While employers naturally want to do everything to protect their business, the rights of employees are also in the foreground. Good communication and education can help to avoid misunderstandings and unnecessary escalations. If theft is suspected, you should always try to search for the conversation before you use more drastic measures that may not be legally durable.

summarized the theft in the supermarket is a wake -up call for everyone: both when it comes to professional protection against misconduct and in respecting dealing with the rights of the employees, a good hand is needed. In the event of further information on the case, we are looking forward to the further developments!

• Brandenburg police
• Deutsche Handwerkszeitung
• FAZ