DBF admits VAR error: Will Bayern have to repeat against Leipzig soon?
DFB admits VAR errors in the game between Bayern and Leipzig: cancellation of a goal raises questions and could lead to protests.

DBF admits VAR error: Will Bayern have to repeat against Leipzig soon?
FC Bayern Munich drew attention last weekend with a brilliant 6-0 win against RB Leipzig in the Bundesliga opener. However, the great victory was overshadowed by a controversial incident. A goal by Leipzig attacker Antonio Nusa in the 64th minute was canceled after a thorough review by the video assistant (VAR). There was an explosive twist here that provided plenty of material for discussion.
The controversial goal was annulled after Joshua Kimmich loudly protested against the decision. Referee Florian Badstübner then consulted the VAR, which resulted in the goal being revoked for Leipzig. Manuel Gräfe, a former Bundesliga referee, criticized this intervention and explained that checking the free kick that preceded the goal was not part of the VAR's duties. Castello Lukeba's free kick was not taken correctly as the ball was not played but only dribbled, which resulted in Kimmich receiving a yellow card.
DSB admits mistakes
The German Football Association (DFB) has now admitted that the decision that canceled the goal was not in accordance with the rules [focus.de]. Alex Feuerherdt, the DFB referee spokesman, confirmed that the referees subsequently asked the VAR because of Kimmich's protests. However, this approach was incorrect. Gräfe also raises concerns about a possible objection from Leipzig, although he is rather skeptical as to whether Leipzig will dare to take this step.
There are no consequences under sports law to be expected for Bayern themselves. According to DFB rules, the result of a game will be counted even if illegal decisions were made during a video review. An objection from Leipzig that could question the outcome of the game would not change the result.
What's next?
The situation raises questions about how such contentious decisions should be dealt with in the future. Gräfe said that it was not productive for lawyers to decide on sporting decisions. While the aftermath of this incident is causing debate, it remains to be seen how RB Leipzig will react to the annulment of the goal. However, so far there has been no official confirmation of a protest against the game rating.
The communication and decisions surrounding the VAR continue to raise questions and are of great importance not only for the clubs affected, but also for the spectators. The DFB bureaucracy is therefore responsible for bringing clarity to the confusing situation and strengthening the focus on fairness in the game.